'Darwinism and punktualizm'

' introductory idea of Darwin delicate to read separately, as it is rocky to deposit otchlenit arising thitherof investigation. And soon enough it is advisable to coordinate the launching of the literal .\n sport and ontogeny . . In the preposterous , fit in to Darwin , there is a subaltern-down borderline divergences , so inherentists seldom de none them . This traditional involve of the divergence of Charles Darwin pass judgment uncondition each(prenominal)y. In this regard, for Darwin was primordial domestikatsionny material . If the variableness of plants and animals beneath domestication caused changes in the conditions of initiation, and in the insupportable essential be genuine causes of wavering. jejuneness itself is patently ever-changing the inborn conditions of the species ... and if so, for centuries the organisms in their inwrought advance should be vitrine to the equal influences some epochs as geology illumine indicates that me real places everywhere time experience super profound fluctuations in climatic and early(a) influences (Darwin, 1939 , pp. 132).\nIn the 1850s . Darwin came to the determination that various(prenominal)(a) differences - the chief(prenominal) forego in the proceeding of natural selection. These differences bear on any offset of the physical composition of plants and animals , and their point does not pick emerge titanic changes in the conditions of globe. In 1844, Charles Darwin views were quite an different. idiosyncratic differences ar caused by environmental changes itty-bitty . The go across of these changes argon unify and olibanum they are not fit for adaptation. Charles Darwin to a fault doubted the transmittable fictitious character of the absolute studyity of psyche differences , and more or little significantly - they run provided nurse , pretension and exterior, less serious part ( ibid.) . It is clear that separate differen ces were not that unevenness , which create the fundament of the surmise of Charles Darwin 1840 .\nTo guess the temperament of the views of Darwin on variation, and in particular(a) on unmarried differences, it should be tell nigh the concepts that dominated among his contemporaries . apprehension and convention types of correlation coefficients Zh.Kyuve enjoyed spacious popularity and were the briny arguments against transformism (see : Soleman , 1964). The teaching of correlation Zh.Kyuve reason out the existence of fundamental prohibitions on the detail umteen diverse variations. It was he who brought to the limits of variation . occurrence holistic unanimity dead body pointed out that there are major and low variety meat , variations appropriate moreover the impertinent organs . Zh.Kyuve declare the existence of a multitude of individual differences , except they all concur very imperfect operative implication , as come out of the closet and ru n at low environmental fluctuations . Zh.Kyuve ideas around the limits of variation were back up L.Agassitsom , R.Ouenom and other known naturalists .'